New study📅 25.05.2026🤖 AI Research

Caffeine and Endurance: Even 1.3–3 mg/kg Improves Time-Trial Performance (n=716, 48 RCTs)

A Brazilian team has updated the picture for the world's most popular sports supplement. A new systematic review of 48 randomized, placebo-controlled trials shows you do not need to load up on 6 mg/kg of caffeine — even a small cup of espresso 30 to 60 minutes before a run measurably improves performance. Moderate doses of 4 to 6 mg/kg, however, deliver a noticeably more consistent effect.

What was studied

The Brazilian research group pooled all randomized controlled trials that compared a single dose of anhydrous caffeine versus placebo in adults performing aerobic exercise under a time-trial protocol (running, cycling, swimming, rowing).

48 studies were included, with a total of 716 participants. Doses were split into three categories:

The authors used a random-effects model because of substantial between-study heterogeneity, and assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane RoB tool.

The main result

Both low and moderate doses significantly reduced time-trial completion time versus placebo. The standardized mean difference (SMD) is the effect size — a negative value means "time decreased":

Caffeine doseSMD (95% CI)p-valueEffect size
Low (1.3–3 mg/kg)−0.27 (−0.44; −0.11)0.001small but significant
Moderate (4–6 mg/kg)−0.52 (−0.77; −0.28)<0.0001moderate, more consistent
High (>6 mg/kg)no benefit over moderate+ risk of side effects

For context: an SMD of 0.2 is considered a small effect, 0.5 moderate, and 0.8 large. So moving from placebo to a moderate dose of caffeine gives what statisticians call a "moderate" boost — which on a 10K race translates to tens of seconds for a recreational runner.

The headline finding: this is the first meta-analysis to demonstrate that doses as low as 1.3–3 mg/kg are enough for an aerobic effect. Until now, sports nutrition guidelines recommended 3–6 mg/kg as the "minimum effective" range.

What this means for you

If you are a recreational athlete rather than a professional, the practical takeaways are:

  1. You do not need megadoses. One strong cup of coffee (≈100–150 mg) or a double espresso (≈150–200 mg) 30 to 60 minutes before training already provides a measurable endurance advantage.
  2. A moderate dose works more reliably. If you are preparing for a race or a key training session, 4–6 mg/kg (280–420 mg for a 70 kg person) gives a better effect-to-predictability ratio.
  3. "More" does not mean "better." Doses above 6 mg/kg provide no additional performance benefit but raise the chance of tachycardia, GI upset, tremor, and sleep disruption.
  4. Tolerance. The authors did not run a subgroup analysis comparing habitual coffee drinkers versus non-consumers. If you drink three or more cups daily, the effect is likely smaller — other literature suggests as much.

One important nuance: calculate your dose by body weight, not by eye. 200 mg for a 60 kg person is 3.3 mg/kg (the low end of moderate), but for a 90 kg person it is only 2.2 mg/kg (still in the low range). A useful hack: check the label on coffee capsules or pre-workout gels.

Important caveats

Several limitations the authors explicitly note:

This is a preprint on the Preprints.org platform — published without full peer review. The numbers and conclusions may be refined when the paper appears in a journal. Caffeine is not a substitute for training; do not exceed 400 mg/day, and consult your doctor if you have hypertension, arrhythmia, anxiety disorders, or are pregnant.

📚 Source

Systematic review and meta-analysis
Martins GL, Aparecido JM, Marquezi ML, Frientes CS, Miedes LR, Fornel MS, Fernandes T, Lancha-Jr AH
Brazil · Preprints.org preprint · 2026-05-08
🔗 Preprints.org: 10.20944/preprints202605.0463.v1

Want to dial in your personal caffeine dose?

NutriAI Pro factors in your body weight, training load, and goals — and suggests safe ergogenic strategies without overloading you.

Open @botnutraibot →